We would like to ask more of our member their views about our Lectures. Your evaluation and the others we receive will be confidential and will remain anonymous. The idea is to ask a different group of members every time so you wont be asked that often. We send evaluations of all our lectures to the National Arts Society so that if there are any concerns they can be addressed and any praise noted. At area level all Kent Societies share their ratings twice a year. It is a great help with programme planning – It’s always good to know what other societies think about a lecture or lecturer.

Please respond to tealehazel@gmail.com

You can of course email me after any lecture to make your comments

The categories are:

  1. Outstanding (inspiring)
  2. Excellent (faultless)
  3. Very Good (educational)
  4. Good (minor faults)
  5. Passable (Not Stimulating / uninspiring)
  6. Poor (Below Acceptable Standards)

The words in brackets are a guide to help you decide

Is there any other comment you wish to make?

Hazel Teale